MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Education

Integrating STEM into curricula: a systematic review and proposed implementation framework

2026Open accessUniversity of Hargeisa

Abstract

Introduction There has been increased interest in improving the quality of education by integrating STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education into the curriculum. Scholars suggest that well‑integrated STEM education equips students with diverse skills and real‑world experiences that align with national priorities and industry needs. Despite its potential, many barriers continue to hinder effective STEM implementation. Methods This systematic review examined the challenges associated with integrating STEM education into curricula and explored possible solutions. Following the PRISMA approach, 28 peer‑reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 were selected for analysis. A qualitative content analysis was conducted to develop codes, categories, and themes. Results The review identified six key thematic areas affecting STEM integration: (1) systemic barriers, (2) teacher challenges, (3) student factors, (4) curriculum issues, (5) pedagogical gaps, and (6) strategies and solutions. Teacher‑related issues, particularly inadequate professional development and limited interdisciplinary knowledge—emerged as the most fundamental barriers. Resource limitations and policy gaps were also found to be significant impediments. Discussion The findings indicate that teacher empowerment is central to successful STEM integration. To address the identified barriers, this review proposes a comprehensive framework emphasizing robust professional development for teachers, alignment of curricula with industry needs and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), pedagogical innovation, and strong policy support. The framework is designed to serve as a generic and adaptable tool for promoting effective and inclusive STEM integration across diverse educational contexts.

Research topics

  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Educational Methods and Outcomes

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2026.1717283

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.