article · Next Materials
Feedstock variability remains a major constraint in small-scale biomass conversion systems, yet preliminary feedstock screening often relies on bulk fuel properties that provide limited insight into decomposition behavior. This study compares binder-less briquetted groundnut shell (GNS) and pine wood chippings (PWC) to determine how bulk composition, prepared-surface morphology, surface elemental signals, and broad functional-group signatures coincide with inert thermal decomposition behavior. Both feedstocks were conditioned to low moisture content and characterized using proximate analysis, higher heating value determination, thermogravimetric analysis under nitrogen, SEM-EDX, and ATR-FTIR. PWC exhibited higher volatile matter than GNS (71.88 vs. 67.40 wt% db.) and lower ash content (1.72 vs. 3.30 wt% db.), whereas GNS showed higher fixed carbon (19.94 vs. 17.18 wt% db.) and higher HHV (18.87 vs. 17.04 MJ kg⁻¹). Under inert heating, PWC decomposed earlier, with lower onset and peak decomposition temperatures, whereas GNS retained substantially more terminal residue at 1000 °C. SEM revealed a more heterogeneous, fracture-dominated prepared surface for GNS and a more fibrous, channel-like prepared surface for PWC. EDX and ATR-FTIR further supported differences in detected surface elemental balance and broad functional-group profiles. Overall, the results demonstrate statistically consistent differences between the two briquetted residues and establish a characterization-based basis for cautious preliminary screening. In the absence of ultimate analysis, direct lignocellulosic fractionation, mineralogical analysis, and reactor-scale gasification testing, the findings define a comparative laboratory basis for interpreting inert decomposition behavior, rather than a predictive framework for gasifier performance.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.102842
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.