article · Journal of Energy Storage
Hydrogen holds significant potential as a clean energy carrier, yet storage limitations remain a primary obstacle to widespread adoption. Recent advances focus on material classes such as metal hydrides, complex hydrides, carbon materials, metal-organic frameworks, and other porous structures to improve reversible hydrogen uptake and release. Over sixty percent of reviewed studies investigate metal hydrides and alloys. Nanotechnology and parameter optimisation during synthesis are critical to tailoring material performance for specific uses, with mechanical milling offering a cost-effective route to fabricate intermetallic hydrides with tuned storage behaviour. In addition to kinetic and capacity challenges, storage safety remains critical, particularly regarding tank embrittlement and subcritical crack growth. Developing materials with superior performance and structural stability provides a pathway towards safer, more dependable hydrogen energy systems.
Clean hydrogen cannot transform energy systems without safe, compact, and efficient storage methods. Identifying high-performing materials helps resolve the main physical bottleneck preventing zero-emission fuel adoption in transport and stationary power. Examining storage degradation and tank embrittlement also ensures future hydrogen infrastructure can operate safely under demanding practical conditions.
The findings are relevant to hydrogen infrastructure developers, fuel system manufacturers, and material suppliers looking to scale solid-state storage. Mechanical milling offers an immediate, cost-effective manufacturing route for intermetallic hydrides. However, with persistent challenges in storage kinetics, capacity, and embrittlement cracking, the underlying technologies sit at an intermediate development stage between laboratory research and early-stage real-world implementation case studies.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Hydrogen, globally recognized as the most efficient and clean energy carrier, holds the potential to transform future energy systems through its use as a fuel and chemical resource. Although progress has been made in reversible hydrogen adsorption and release, challenges in storage continue to impede widespread adoption. This review explores recent advancements in hydrogen storage materials and synthesis methods, emphasizing the role of nanotechnology and innovative synthesis techniques in enhancing storage performance and addressing these challenges to drive progress in the field. The review provides a comprehensive overview of various material classes, including metal hydrides, complex hydrides, carbon materials, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and porous materials. Over 60 % of reviewed studies focused on metal hydrides and alloys for hydrogen storage. Additionally, the impact of nanotechnology on storage performance and the importance of optimizing synthesis parameters to tailor material properties for specific applications are summarized. Various synthesis methods are evaluated, with a special emphasis on the role of nanotechnology in improving storage performance. Mechanical milling emerges as a commonly used and cost-effective method for fabricating intermetallic hydrides capable of adjusting hydrogen storage properties. The review also explores hydrogen storage tank embrittlement mechanisms, particularly subcritical crack growth, and examines the advantages and limitations of different materials for various applications, supported by case studies showcasing real-world implementations. The challenges underscore current limitations in hydrogen storage materials, highlighting the need for improved storage capacity and kinetics. The review also explores prospects for developing materials with enhanced performance and safety, providing a roadmap for ongoing advancements in the field. Key findings and directions for future research in hydrogen storage materials emphasize their critical role in shaping future energy systems.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2024.112376
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
