MARATTO

article · Journal of Research in Educational Sciences

Industrial Disputes Management and Academic Staff Welfare Improvement in Nigerian Universities

2024Open accessBowen University

Abstract

There is a growing need to address the unique challenges of academic staff in universities such as unsatisfactory welfare and incessant disputes. In this regard, industrial dispute management was looked into as a tool to improve the welfare of academic staff in Nigeria. The study adopted the quantitative research approach and descriptive research design. The population of the study was academic staff from six federal universities in Southwest, Nigeria. A sample size of 377 was determined using the Taro Yamane sample size determination and was distributed to the selected Universities based on their respective population. The study sourced for primary data through which a structured questionnaire that was administered online to academic staff. Data collected were analysed with inferential statistical techniques such as correlation and regression analysis. The study found that collective bargaining has significant negative impact on the welfare of academic staff in the universities investigated (β=-0.494, p<005). Similalry, industrial communication had a negative significant impact on the welfare of academic staff in the universities investigated (β=-0.438, p<005). Furthermore, joint consultation had a negative significant impact on the welfare of academic staff in the universities investigated (β=-0.462, p<005). It was also revealed that industrial democracy had a negative significant impact on the welfare of academic staff in the universities investigated (β=-0.319, p<005). It was concluded that the existing industrial disputes management tools are not helping out in improving academic staff welfare in the universities. The study recommends a new approach to improving academic welfare without disputes.

Research topics

  • Socioeconomic Development in MENA

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.14505/jres.v15.2(18).03

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.