MARATTO

article · Internal Medicine Open Access

Induction of Labor Prevalence and Associated Factors for Its Outcome at Wolliso St. Luke, Catholic Hospital, South West Shewa, Oromia

201726 citationsMekelle University

In plain language

A retrospective review of 340 delivery records at Wolliso St. Luke Catholic Hospital in southwest Ethiopia evaluated the prevalence and outcomes of labour induction. Across the reviewed cases, 76 women, representing 22.4 percent of deliveries, underwent labour induction. The successful induction rate among these patients was 57.89 percent, which reflects 44 successful cases. Statistical evaluations using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression established that gestational age, Bishop score, fetal heart beats, membrane rupture prior to induction, and APGAR scores were significantly associated with induction success. Compared to rates seen in developed nations, the prevalence of induction in the studied setting is somewhat lower. Because the observed success rate remains low, clinical strategies require refinement, alongside targeted monitoring of significant risk factors to prevent maternal and fetal complications during delivery.

Key takeaways

  • Labour induction occurred in 22.4 percent of evaluated hospital deliveries.
  • The overall success rate among induced labour cases was 57.89 percent.
  • Factors significantly associated with induction success included gestational age, Bishop score, fetal heart beats, membrane rupture before induction, and APGAR score.
  • The observed success rate was low, pointing to a need to address associated risk factors to reduce complications.

Why it matters

Induction of labour is an essential obstetric procedure when delivering is safer than continuing pregnancy. Understanding local induction rates and identifying the physiological determinants linked to successful deliveries helps clinicians anticipate complications. Addressing these factors enables health facilities to improve procedural success rates, ensuring safer maternal and neonatal outcomes during childbirth.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Background: Over recent decades, more pregnant women around the world have undergone labor induction to deliver their babies. In developing countries up to 25% of all deliveries at term now involve induction of labor, but in some developing countries the rate are generally lower. Induction is indicated when the benefits to either the mother or the fetus outweigh those of continuing the pregnancy. Objective: To determine the prevalence of labor induction and factors associated to the outcome of induced labor at Wolliso St. Luke, catholic Hospital, South west Ethiopia. Methods: Institutional based retrospective cross-sectional study design was conducted to describe the prevalence of labor induction, and factors associated with its outcome. Logistic regression analysis Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression were employed to assess the relative effect of determinants and statistical tests were used to see the associations. Result: A total of 340 delivery record was reviewed. Out of this 76 (22.4%) of women undergone induction of labor with a success rate of 44 (57.89%). In logistic regression analysis gestational age, Bishop Score, fetal heart beats, membrane rapture before induction of labor and APGAR score showed significant association to the success of induced labor. Conclusion: The finding indicated that the prevalence of induced labor in study area was a bit lower compared to developed countries. The success rate is low that need improvement, so as address the problems related to the outcomes of induced labor. Furthermore the associated risk factors also due attention to prevent further complication.

Research topics

  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4172/2165-8048.1000255

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.