article · The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Abstract Background The global prevalence of obesity continues to rise, with 3 billion adults projected to be affected by 2030. Recent advances in anti-obesity pharmacotherapy, particularly incretin-based medications, have transformed obesity management. This consensus provides evidence-based guidelines for the clinical use of incretin-based obesity management medications (OMMs). Methods This consensus was developed through consensus narrative review and expert panel deliberation, examining current evidence for approved anti-obesity medications and emerging therapies. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through April 2026. Evidence quality was categorized according to study design, consistency of findings, and clinical applicability. Results Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and GLP-1/gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) dual agonists demonstrate substantial efficacy, with mean weight loss ranging from 5–10% with liraglutide to 21–26% with tirzepatide across various endpoints. These medications are recommended for individuals with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 or ≥ 27 kg/m 2 with weight-related comorbidities. Common adverse effects include gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), while serious complications are rare. Emerging therapies in development show promising efficacy profiles, with some triple agonists achieving > 20% weight loss in Phase 2 trials. Conclusions Incretin-based OMMs represent an important therapeutic option when combined with lifestyle interventions. Appropriate patient selection, systematic monitoring, and proactive management of adverse events are essential for optimising outcomes. Ongoing research into novel agents, long-term safety data, and cardiovascular outcomes will continue to refine clinical practice. Implementation should be guided by shared decision-making, considering individual patient factors, preferences, and healthcare system resources.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s43162-026-00689-w
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.