article · Quantitative Finance
This paper analyses the attributes and the significance of the roughness of oil market volatility. We employ unspanned stochastic volatility models driven by rough Brownian motions that yield semi-analytical prices for future options entailing efficient calibration applications. By performing a Monte Carlo simulation study, we show that the semi-analytical pricing performs well thus establishing its efficiency for calibration applications. Thus we calibrate option prices written on oil futures and provide empirical evidence of the roughness in oil volatility. Introducing just one additional parameter, the Hurst parameter, indicating the roughness of the volatility improves the calibration by almost a factor of 10. The calibrated option-implied Hurst parameter varies over time, but the entire set of parameters becomes more stable than in the non-rough case corresponding to a fixed Hurst parameter 1/2. These results underscore the importance to model the time dependency of the roughness of oil market volatility.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2023.2291081
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.