MARATTO

article · Foods

Impact of Traditional Food Processing Techniques on Mineral Bioaccessibility in Ghanaian Fermented Millet-Based Koko and Zoomkoom

Abstract

In this study, the impacts of traditional processing on phytates contents, phytate: mineral molar ratios, and the bioaccessibility of calcium, iron, and zinc in three traditional <i>koko</i> production units (KP1, KP2, and KP3) and two <i>zoomkoom</i> production units (ZP1 and ZP2) products were assessed based on the variations in their traditional processing techniques. The total calcium content of ZP1 was ranked the highest (58.02 mg/100 g, <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared to other processed samples. A high total value of iron (17.76 mg/100 g, <i>p</i> < 0.05) was revealed among <i>koko</i> compared to <i>zoomkoom</i>. Whereas KP3 and ZP2 showed the highest (<i>p</i> < 0.05) amount of zinc (3.34 mg/100 g). ZP1 showed a calcium bioaccessibility of 6.3% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The iron bioaccessibility was within the average range of 5-30%, with KP1 ranking the highest (21.8%), while ZP1 showed the highest value (42.2%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in bioaccessibility of zinc among the <i>zoomkoom</i> products. The processing techniques adopted caused up to a 56.7% to 76.76% reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.05) of phytic acid in the pearl millet, leading to a decrease in the molar ratios of [Ca]:[Phy], [Fe]:[Phy], and [Phy]:[Zn]. However, the phytic acid content varied among the <i>koko</i> and <i>zoomkoom,</i> corresponding with the varied inhibitory mechanism indices reported. In brief, a positive correlation was shown between the traditional processing techniques, phytate, and in vitro bioaccessibility of minerals, indicating the consumption of <i>koko</i> and <i>zoomkoom</i> as a good source of functional minerals.

Research topics

  • Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • African Botany and Ecology Studies
  • Food composition and properties

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/foods14122126

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.