article · The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Background: Because of its many advantages, minimally invasive surgery, has emerged as the gold standard for treatingcolorectal disorders in the industrialized world. Obesity is a technological hurdle for minimally invasive colorectalresection surgery as it grows more common. Numerous research projects have looked at the clinical results of surgery inobese patients.Objective: To evaluate the impact of obesity on minimally invasive colorectal surgery.Patients and Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted at the Colorectal Unit, General SurgeryDepartment, Ain Shams Hospitals on patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for various diseases on anelective basis through the last 3 years. They were divided into two groups: control (nonobese) and study (obese) groups. Wecollected data on the patients from records in the colorectal unit. Patients’ data were collected from perioperative recordsof each patient (intraoperative events, conversion rate, and complications). Cases were assessed as regards operative time,conversion rate, intraoperative events, chest problems from anesthesia due to CO2 inflation to make pneumoperitoneumfor the laparoscope, and early postoperative complications such as surgical-site infection, leakage, and hospital stay.Results: As regards operative time, there was a statistically significant long time of operation time in the obese group incomparison to the nonobese group with a P value less than 0.001. As regards intraoperative events and conversion rate,the estimated blood loss was a bit higher in the obese group with no statistical significance. Five cases in the obese groupwere converted to open, while only one case in the nonobese group was converted to open. However, this was foundstatistically nonsignificant with a P value of 0.193. We had nine cases of surgical-site infection in the obese group versustwo cases in the nonobese group.Conclusion: We can conclude that obesity had an adverse impact on outcomes of minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/ejsur.2024.276784.1026
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.