MARATTO

article · Veterinarski arhiv

Identification of protein expression changes in milk in experimental bovine mastitis using difference gel electrophoresis

Abstract

In order to identify the extent of protein changes in milk during mastitis as a guide to detecting markers for prompt management of the disease, milk from cows in which clinical mastitis was experimentally induced were subjected to difference gel electrophoresis (DiGE) analysis. Pooled samples from 6 udders (from 6 cows) were analysed at selected time points: 0, 81 and 312 hours post-challenge with Streptococcus uberis mastitis. These corresponded to samples from the pre-infection, peak and resolution phases of the mastitis challenge. After the preliminary sample preparation, concentration and pooling steps, samples were labelled with CyDyes (Cydye 2, 3 and 5), after which isoelectric focusing and gel electrophoresis were carried out respectively. DiGE gels were subsequently scanned and ImageQuant, ImageJ and DeCyder™ 2D (version 7.0) softwares were used to crop, obtain jpeg images and carry out 2-D differential analysis and processing of the images, respectively. Biological variation analysis (BVA) software (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) was also used to analyse the gels and create gel to gel matching of spots (qualitatively and quantitatively) within the three gels produced. Overall, a total of 521 protein spots were identified as significantly differentially expressed (qualitatively or quantitatively) in mastitis milk during the course of the intramammary infection. This demonstrates the large repertoire of protein biomarker candidates available, revealed through this technique. Further studies are required to elucidate the merits and demerits of these changing proteins in order to identify the one most suitable for clinical application in mastitis diagnosis.

Research topics

  • Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Meat and Animal Product Quality

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.24099/vet.arhiv.1935

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.