article · Sustainability
Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a key vector for sustainable energy transitions, deep decarbonization, and enhanced energy security. This review evaluates major hydrogen types, grey, blue, and green, through a comparative assessment of production pathways, cost structures, technological maturity, and market readiness, with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Grey hydrogen, while currently dominant due to established fossil-based infrastructure and low costs, is associated with high carbon emissions and climate-related risks. Blue hydrogen offers a transitional pathway via carbon capture and storage but faces constraints in SSA from high capital requirements, limited CCS infrastructure, and methane leakage. Green hydrogen, produced through renewable-powered electrolysis, represents the most sustainable long-term option, aligned with global net-zero goals and SSA’s abundant solar and wind resources, despite higher upfront costs. Synthesizing recent techno-economic, policy, and regional studies, the review highlights that prioritizing green hydrogen deployment supported by enabling policy frameworks, targeted investments, and capacity building is critical for unlocking SSA’s hydrogen potential, promoting low-carbon development, and advancing sustainable energy transitions across the region.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/su18073647
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.