MARATTO

article · Food Chemistry Advances

Human health risk from dietary exposure to heavy metals through poultry eggs: Evidence from commercial farms in Wakiso District, Uganda

2026Open accessMakerere University

Abstract

• Elevated Cr, As, Cd found in eggs from Kajansi and Katabi areas. • Weekly metal intake via eggs is below global safety limits. • Significant intake differences linked to feed and environment. • ICP-MS data from 53 farms informs food safety strategy. • First Ugandan study linking feed contamination to human exposure. Uganda’s projected annual egg consumption of 1.9 kg per capita by 2025 raises concerns over heavy metal contamination in poultry products. Wakiso District, a peri‑urban hub supplying Kampala, faces potential exposure risks due to inconsistent feed quality. This study sampled 53 poultry farms in Wakiso District. Egg and feed samples were analyzed for chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), arsenic (As), and cadmium (Cd) using ICP-MS. Weekly intake estimates were derived from FAO consumption data and compared against WHO/JECFA and Codex thresholds. Spatial variation was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test. Cr levels peaked at 6.72 ± 4.91 mg/kg in Kajansi, with intake of 237.6 μg/week, below the JECFA limit of 2100 μg. As reached 1.36 ± 0.48 mg/kg, with intake up to 42.3 μg/week, under the WHO threshold of 1050 μg. Cd exposure peaked at 0.15 ± 0.10 mg/kg, translating to 2.69 μg/week, below the FAO limit of 2695 μg. Significant spatial differences were observed for Cr (H = 41.77), As (H = 49.82), and Cd (H = 31.94), all p < 0.001. While overall intake remains within safety limits, localized contamination in Kajansi and Katabi suggests cumulative risk, hence need for regulations and feed and residue monitoring.

Research topics

  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Chromium effects and bioremediation

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.focha.2026.101243

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.