MARATTO

article · Nanoscale

How many electrons to stabilize the icosahedral Cu<sub>55</sub> core in ligated nanoclusters? The example of [Cu<sub>55</sub>(NHC)<sub>6</sub>]

Abstract

While ligand-protected clusters with M<sub>55</sub> icosahedral cores are rarely encountered so far, DFT calculations have been performed on a series of bare and ligated Cu<sub>55</sub> clusters, including the structurally characterized [Cu<sub>55</sub>(IDipp)<sub>6</sub>]. Calculations indicate that the best closed-shell superatomic electron counts for such species are 48, 50, 52 and 56. None of them is a superatom "magic" number. The closest "magic" number, namely 58, which would correspond to full occupation of the 1G level, is highly disfavored. The 48, 50, 52 and 56 counts correspond to 1G partial occupations and can be rationalized from Jahn-Teller distortions away from <i>R</i><sup>3</sup> or <i>I</i><sub>h</sub> symmetry. Similar calculations on related Au<sub>55</sub> clusters provided comparable results, with the exception of the 52-electron count, which is not favored as a closed-shell with gold. Neutral ligands such as NHCs, are expected to stabilize efficiently the closed-shell 56-electron count, providing they are able to sterically screen all the "exposed" metal atoms.

Research topics

  • Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Metal complexes synthesis and properties

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1039/d5nr01400j

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.