MARATTO

article · Exploration of Foods and Foodomics

High-resolution trace element profiling of culinary spices using ICP-MS: a comparative study on nutritional and toxicological markers for food safety surveillance

2026Open accessMohamed I University

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize and quantify essential and potentially toxic elements in commonly consumed spices in order to evaluate their nutritional value and assess possible food-safety risks related to metal contamination. Four spices: fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), black pepper (Piper nigrum), turmeric (Curcuma longa), and ginger (Zingiber officinale) were collected from a supermarket in Mehdia (Kenitra, Morocco). Samples were homogenized, sieved (< 250 μm), and digested using a nitric/perchloric acid mixture (3:1, v/v) following AOAC Method 999.10. Sixteen elements were determined using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Quality assurance was ensured through the use of blanks, duplicate analyses, and certified reference material (NIST SRM 1573a). The results revealed significant elemental variability among the spices: ginger showed the highest sodium and manganese levels, turmeric was rich in potassium and magnesium, black pepper exhibited elevated calcium, and fenugreek contained high phosphorus concentrations. Lead was detected in all samples (3.60–15.90 μg/kg), remaining below Codex Alimentarius limits. Overall, the findings demonstrate the reliability of ICP-MS for ultra-trace elemental analysis in spices and confirm their dual nutritional and toxicological relevance. Although toxic metal levels were within regulatory limits, continuous monitoring and strengthened safety controls are recommended to minimize potential health risks.

Research topics

  • Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Trace Elements in Health

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.37349/eff.2026.1010139

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.