MARATTO

article · Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology

Groundwater Quality Assessment in the Coastal Mediterranean Aquifer of Northeastern Morocco - A GIS-Based Approach

202331 citationsOpen accessIbn Tofail University

Abstract

Groundwater quality degradation is a pressing concern in semi-arid coastal regions, exemplified by the Ghiss-Nekor aquifer in northeastern Morocco, spanning 100 km². This study adopts a comprehensive approach, utilizing Chloro-Alkaline Indices, hydrochemical facies diagrams, the Water Quality Index (WQI), and the Synthetic Pollution Index (SPI) to assess groundwater quality and its evolution. Key findings reveal that Ghiss-Nekor groundwater is brackish, primarily suitable for irrigation due to high Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). Salinization stems from reverse cation exchange, as indicated by hydrochemical analyses. WQI assessments highlight the inadequacy of this groundwater for drinking purposes, with SPI classifying 54% of wells as moderately polluted. Fine particles mitigate marine intrusion in the northwest. Overlaying land-use and electrical conductivity maps identify areas with poor-quality groundwater, notably near an unregulated landfill, a coastal tourist site, and a wastewater treatment facility. Ionic analysis identifies multiple saline sources, with nitrate and sulfate contributions standing out. While the study offers valuable insights, limitations include the need for ongoing data collection and source identification challenges. Nonetheless, the research underscores the urgency of effective water management, particularly around the landfill site situated above permeable deposits, offering an innovative approach with global applicability for addressing groundwater quality issues in semi-arid coastal areas.

Research topics

  • Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.12912/27197050/173567

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.