MARATTO

article · Land

Geochemical Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in North Riyadh Soils: Pollution Indices and Multivariate Source Apportionment

2026Open accessTanta University

Abstract

This study provides baseline information for environmental assessment in North Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It assessed the concentrations of eight heavy metals, namely cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn), in 28 surface soil samples collected across the area. Pollution status was evaluated using the contamination factor (CF), geoaccumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), pollution load index (PLI), and degree of contamination (DC), while Pearson correlation, principal component analysis (PCA), and standardized hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were applied to identify the possible sources of these metals. Iron was the most abundant element (mean 8482.14 mg kg−1), consistent with its role as a major crustal constituent. Co, Cr, Fe, Ni, and V showed low contamination (CF < 1) and a predominantly geogenic origin, reflected in strong inter-element correlations and a dominant rotated principal component explaining 54.8% of the total variance; Cu, Pb, and, in particular, Zn departed from this pattern, loading together on a distinct secondary component (32.1% of variance) and showing localized enrichment at a small number of sites. None of the 28 samples exceeded the pollution threshold for PLI (all < 1) or DC (all < 8), indicating that the soils of North Riyadh remain overall unpolluted with respect to these eight metals. These findings provide an early geochemical baseline for the district and identify Cu–Pb–Zn enrichment near construction and traffic corridors.

Research topics

  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/land15081482

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.