article · Minerals
The Dongwujiiazi deposit is a structurally controlled orogenic gold deposit situated in the eastern part of the Chifeng–Chaoyang gold belt along the northern boundary of the North China Craton. This study establishes a comprehensive metallogenic model for the Dongwujiiazi gold deposit by integrating whole-rock geochemistry (major and trace elements), in situ trace elements and REEs in zircon, multi-isotope systems (H, O, S, Pb), and precise zircon U–Pb geochronology. Five types of intrusive and associated rocks are identified within the main biotite-pyroxene gneiss host of the Dongwujiiazi gold deposit: mylonitized granitic pegmatite, mylonitized porphyritic monzogranite, propylitized fine-grained quartz monzodiorite, quartz monzonite, and porphyritic dolerite. The gold-bearing polymetallic sulfide ores are composed of pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena, digenite, and native gold. Zircon grains in the Dongwujiiazi gold ore (2502 ± 15 to 2539 ± 18 Ma) are inherited from surrounding Neoarchean gneiss, recording older crustal sources rather than forming contemporaneously with the gold mineralization. H–O isotopes indicate that the ore-forming fluids were mixed in origin, involving both magmatic and metamorphic components. S and Pb isotopes suggest that the mineralizing sulfur was mainly derived from a magmatic source, while lead originated predominantly from lower crustal materials associated with the surrounding high-grade metamorphic rocks. In this study, we present a new metallogenic model for the Dongwujiiazi gold deposit, in which slab-derived and lower-crustal metamorphic fluids interacted with ascending magmas, resulting in fluid mixing and gold precipitation within structurally controlled zones of gneissic host rocks. Combined geochemical and isotopic evidence (H–O, S, Pb) indicates contributions from both magmatic and metamorphic sources, supporting formation as an intracontinental orogenic gold system in an active continental margin.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/min16050435
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.