article · Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
The rapid digitalisation of banking has increased exposure to financial cybercrime, while existing fraud-detection methods remain limited by single-modality data, class imbalance, concept drift, and poor explainability. This study developed and evaluated the Generative AI-Enhanced Multimodal Transformer Framework (GAMT-Fraud), an explainable artificial intelligence model that integrates transactional, behavioural, and network data for fraud detection. The framework combines a multimodal attention transformer, gradient-boosted learning, and variational autoencoder-based anomaly detection, while synthetic minority augmentation addresses data imbalance. Using a quantitative experimental design, the framework was trained and validated on the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computational Intelligence Society (IEEE-CIS) and PaySim benchmark datasets through stratified data partitioning, five-fold cross-validation, and bootstrap significance testing. Performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, area under the ROC curve (AUC), Matthews correlation coefficient, and precision-recall area. Results showed that GAMT-Fraud consistently outperformed conventional machine-learning and deep-learning baselines across both datasets, achieving statistically significant improvements in fraud-detection performance. Shapley-value-based explainability further enhanced transparency and regulatory compliance by providing interpretable decision insights. The study demonstrates that integrating generative AI, sequential learning, and relational analysis within a unified framework can improve fraud-detection effectiveness. It contributes a scalable, explainable, and auditable fraud-intelligence architecture and provides a replicable foundation for future research in multimodal and adversarial financial fraud detection. The framework is presented as an experimental and auditable proof of concept rather than evidence of immediate real-world deployment.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.9734/jerr/2026/v28i71953
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.