MARATTO

preprint

Gender-specific antibiotic-resistance patterns and characterization of bacterial flora of undergraduate students’ mobile phones and associated factors at a Nigerian University

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> <bold>Background</bold> Technological development has led to the wide use of mobile phones. However, the role of the hand-held device in the possible spread of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens considering gender variation, especially among Nigerian undergraduates is poorly understood. This study aimed to assess bacterial isolates recovered from male and female mobile phones for antibiotic resistance and determine possible factors that could facilitate their spread. <bold>Methods</bold> Forty (40) undergraduates were included in the study with gender parity. Swabs of the undergraduates' mobile phones were cultured and bacterial isolates were identified using standard microbiology methods. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of the isolates was done using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion assay and the results were interpreted by the Clinical Standards and Laboratory Institute (CLSI) guideline. Bacterial isolates (n=6/21) that resisted antibiotics belonging to ≥ 3 different classes regarded as multidrug resistant (MDR) were subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing and identified using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) algorithm. <bold>Results</bold> The total bacterial count of male (9.2 x 10<sup>6</sup>) CFU/mL and female (9.7 x 10<sup>6</sup>) CFU/mL were high though comparable. Of the 25 isolates recovered, 10 and 15 were respectively from male and female mobile phones. <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (n=11) was the most occurring isolate followed by <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (n=5), and <italic>Salmonella </italic>sp<italic>.</italic> (n=3); the rest occurred less frequently. <italic>Staphylococcus aureus </italic>obtained from male phones (n=7) is higher than in females (n=4) but the species diversity is greater in females (n=7) than in males (n=3) phones. Isolates were resistant to ampiclox and zinnacef (85.71%), erythromycin (78.57%), amoxil and augmentin (72.73%), septrim (72%), rifampicin (71.43%) while &gt;80% were MDR. Low levels of handwashing and non-use of hand sanitizer could be linked with phone bacterial contamination. <bold>Conclusion</bold> Regular handwashing and the use of hand sanitizers should be prioritized among undergraduates to curtail the spread of difficult-to-treat bacterial infections.

Research topics

  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Media in Health Education
  • Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4877264/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.