MARATTO

article · Heliyon

Free radical scavenging mechanism of 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives: thermodynamics of O–H and N–H bond cleavage

202037 citationsOpen accessAhmadu Bello University

In plain language

Computational chemical investigations using density functional theory examine how 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives neutralise oxygen-centred free radicals in both gas phase and water. The analysis evaluates three distinct radical scavenging mechanisms: hydrogen atom transfer, single electron transfer followed by proton transfer, and sequential proton loss electron transfer. Key thermodynamic indicators, including bond dissociation enthalpy, adiabatic ionisation potential, proton dissociation enthalpy, proton affinity, and electron transfer enthalpy, characterise each pathway. Molecular orbital predictions for electron donation correlate well with electron transfer enthalpy values at preferred reactive sites. Calculations of Gibbs free energy indicate that these molecules scavenge peroxyl radicals most efficiently through hydrogen atom transfer and sequential proton loss electron transfer in a vacuum. However, in an aqueous environment, single electron transfer followed by proton transfer emerges as the dominant reaction pathway.

Key takeaways

  • Density functional theory calculations assessed the free radical scavenging mechanisms of 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives in gas and aqueous phases.
  • Molecular orbital predictions of electron donation align closely with calculated electron transfer enthalpies at preferred reaction sites.
  • In vacuum conditions, radical inactivation occurs most efficiently via hydrogen atom transfer and sequential proton loss electron transfer.
  • In aqueous solution, the dominant pathway for radical scavenging shifts to single electron transfer followed by proton transfer.

Why it matters

Free radicals can cause cellular damage and degrade materials, making antioxidant molecules essential in medicine and industrial chemistry. Understanding the exact chemical mechanisms through which compounds like 1,3,4-oxadiazole neutralise radicals in different environments helps researchers predict antioxidant performance and guide the design of more effective protective chemical agents.

Commercialisation angle

This fundamental computational research sits at an early stage. While understanding how 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives neutralise free radicals could inform future antioxidant formulation in pharmaceuticals or materials science, the abstract provides purely theoretical thermodynamic data and does not indicate a direct commercial application pathway or product development plan.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

The thermodynamics of free radical scavenge of 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives towards oxygen-centred free radicals were investigated by the density functional theory (DFT) method in the gas phase and aqueous solution. Three mechanisms of free radical scavenge namely, hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), single electron transfer followed by proton transfer (SET-PT) and sequential proton loss electron transfer (SPLET) were considered. The antioxidant descriptors that characterize these mechanisms such as, bond dissociation enthalpy (BDE), adiabatic ionization potential (AIP), proton dissociation enthalpy (PDE), proton affinity (PA) and electron transfer enthalpy (ETE) were evaluated. The sequence of electron donation as predicted by the HOMO results were in good agreement with the sequence of ETE for the considered molecules at their favoured sites of free radical scavenge. The reaction Gibbs free energy for inactivation of the selected peroxyl radicals, show that 1,3,4-oxadiazole antioxidants are more efficient radical scavengers by HAT and SPLET mechanisms than SET-PT mechanism in vacuum. In aqueous solution, the SET-PT mechanism was observed to be the dominant reaction pathway.

Research topics

  • Free Radicals and Antioxidants
  • Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
  • Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03683

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.