MARATTO

article · Buildings

Fragility Analysis of RC Frames Accounting for In-Plan Irregularity Using Artificially Introduced Incremental Eccentricity

2026Open accessAswan University

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) buildings are the most common structural system in urbanising regions. In many cases, architectural constraints and uneven distribution of structural elements often create eccentricity between the centre of mass (CM) and the centre of rigidity (CR). This eccentricity may induce torsional effects during earthquakes that can significantly influence structural response and increase seismic vulnerability. This study investigates the impact of in-plan irregularity on the seismic performance of RC buildings using nonlinear numerical analyses. Three-dimensional models of four- and six-storey RC buildings with moment resisting frames were developed in OpenSees, where different levels of irregularity were introduced by artificially shifting the lumped mass to generate controlled eccentricities without modifying the structural configuration. Seismic performance was evaluated using nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) based on forty ground motion records under bidirectional excitation. The results indicate that increasing CM–CR eccentricity amplifies inter-storey drift demands and elevates the probability of damage due to intensified torsional stresses. The adverse effect is most pronounced when eccentricity aligns with the direction of lower stiffness, whereas eccentricity in the stiffer direction has a limited impact on severe damage states, particularly for taller buildings. These findings provide valuable insights for risk-informed assessment, retrofitting, and prioritisation of existing plan-irregular RC buildings.

Research topics

  • Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings16112086

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.