MARATTO

article · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science

Four Decades of Systematic Sedimentation at Kiri Dam, Nigeria (1982–2025): Dual-Epoch Bathymetry, Hypsographic Change, and Sedimentological Controls on Water-Supply Reliability

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines sediment dynamics at Kiri Dam, Nigeria (1982–2025), through a two-epoch bathymetric reassessment to measure hypsographic change and assess implications for water-supply reliability. In 2025, a high-resolution bathymetric survey was performed in accordance with IHO S-44 standards using Trimble RTK-GNSS and ADCP depth soundings, achieving a crossline mean absolute deviation of ≤0.12 m and a vertical RMSE of ≤0.05 m. Results were compared with the 1982 design dataset to evaluate elevation-banded losses. At NTWL (170.5 m A.M.S.L.), live storage capacity decreased from 615.00 to 344.15 MCM (−44.0%), while water spread contracted from 106.36 to 67.02 km² (−37.0%). Over 60% of storage loss occurred on depositional benches between 161 and 167 m, increasing the elevation–capacity gradient and intensifying volumetric penalties relative to areal shrinkage (elasticity ≈1.19). Multi-season analyses of particle-size distribution confirmed silty clays and clay loams dominate mid-bench and outflow zones, while sandy sediments at the right bank served as coarse-textured controls. Geochemical assays revealed moderate enrichment of Pb (16–27 mg/kg), Cu (12–19 mg/kg), and Zn (63–72 mg/kg) in fine-grained benches, with low hydrocarbon residues (ΣPAHs ≤0.8 mg/kg, ΣPCBs ≤0.04 mg/kg). A preliminary cost–benefit analysis indicated hydraulic sluicing ($0.5–1.5/m³) to be more feasible than mechanical dredging ($3–8/m³), with catchment stabilisation offering benefit–cost ratios of 1:1.3–2.0. Recommended monitoring includes resurveys every 5–10 years, event-triggered campaigns following ≥Q10 floods or >5% shoreline change, and seasonal PSD and geochemistry sampling.

Research topics

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.51583/ijltemas.2025.1409000051

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.