MARATTO

article · Journal of Animal Science and Applied Biology

Follicular Population and Oocyte Yield Associated with Reproductive Pathologies in Cows (West Region – Cameroon)

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the follicular population, oocyte yield, and reproductive pathologies in cows. It was conducted in slaughterhouses in Cameroon’s west region as well as at the University of Dschang’s animal physiology and health research unit. Post-mortem examinations were performed on 132 local Zebu cows (Gudali, White, and Red Fulani) from which ovaries were collected. 2965 follicles were analyzed and classified based on their size (small, medium, and large). The results showed an average of 22.47 ± 5.38 follicles per cow. The numbers of small, medium, and large follicles were 11.62 ± 2.63, 7.89 ± 2.18, and 1.53 ± 1.51, respectively. From oocytes harvested (graded I to IV), an average of 11.48 ± 2.11 oocytes per cow was observed. The average numbers of grade I, II, III, and IV oocytes were 4.35 ± 1.92, 3.59 ± 2.06, 3.59 ± 1.85, and 3.62 ± 1.75, respectively. 65.9% of the cows assessed had at least one reproductive pathology, including endometritis (18.2%), metritis (11.4%), and anestrus (27.3%). Furthermore, breed, age, and body condition score (BCS) also negatively influenced these reproductive pathologies. Older cows (≥7 years) and those with excellent BCS (BCS = 4–5) exhibited better reproductive performance (P < 0.001). However, pathologies had no significant effect on follicles and oocytes harvested. In conclusion, breed, age, and body condition score (BCS) considerably influence the follicular and oocyte production of local cows. Red Fulani cows had the highest oocyte yield, while White Fulani had a good oocyte index.

Research topics

  • Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.65482/jasab2120263019-28.x

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.