MARATTO

article · Egyptian Journal of Health Care

Fluid adherence and Self-Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: The Effect Nursing Instruction

2024Open accessMinia University

Abstract

Background: Following the recommended fluid regimens is essential to the effectiveness of dialysis since it affects the patient's outcomes and sense of self-efficacy. Aim of the study: Evaluates the fluid adherence and self-efficacy in patients undergoing hemodialysis after receiving the nursing instructions. Research design: To achieve the aim, a Quazi-experimental research design was used.. Setting: This study was conducted at the Hemodialysis Unit, during the dialysis session, at Nephrology and Urology Hospital at Minia University, Minia City, Egypt. Subjects: A purposive sample is constituted (90) patients participated in the study. Tools: For this study, three tools were created and utilized to gather data., First Tool: Interview Questionnaire Sheet includes two parts 1st Part: Personal data. 2nd Part: Medical Data of the patient. Second Tool: Fluid Adherence assessment sheet, which include three parts: 1st part: Fluid Adherence questionnaire, 2nd Part: Pitting Edema Scale. Third tool: Self-efficacy questionnaire. Results: After one and two months, the patient's response to fluid adherence improved in a highly statistically significant manner. Patients self efficacy was statisticay imrpved after the one month and two months of fluid adherence and shows positive correlation. Recommendations: The hospital should pay more attention to and closely monitor patient compliance with therapeutic hydration restriction, and a large sample size should be used for study replication. Conclusion: The current study documented the improvement in fluid adherence among the studied hemodialysis patients after implementing the nursing intervention which approves our study hypothesis.

Research topics

  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/ejhc.2024.401408

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.