MARATTO

article · Natural Resources Forum

Finance and the environment: The eco‐impact of market‐ and institution‐driven development in Africa using land‐use‐adjusted metrics across sources of greenhouse gases

20241 citationOpen accessUniversity of the Witwatersrand

Abstract

Abstract Africa must ensure that its development trajectories are sustainable. In pursuit of viable policy pathways, this study examines the eco‐impact of the energy mix (Te) and financial development (FD) in selected African countries. The Te path is defined using the emission‐intensity paradigm, where positive trends indicate a strong dependence on fossil fuels, while negative trends suggest a shift toward greener energy sources. The FD impact is disaggregated to recognize the separate effects of market‐based (FM) and institution‐based (FI) development. This study utilized land‐use metrics across major greenhouse gas (GHG) sources, drawing data from a panel of 33 countries spanning from 1982 to 2021. It employs a novel instrumental‐variables approach for fitting panel‐data models, addressing cross‐sectional dependence issues and incorporating heterogeneous slope coefficients using the mean‐group estimator. Empirical findings reveal that positive trends in Te have a significant and positive impact on total GHG emissions (GHGe), whereas FM has a negative and significant effect on GHGe, suggesting its active role in mitigating climate impacts. The disaggregation of GHGe highlights the distinct impacts on CO 2 (CO 2 e), nitrous oxide (N 2 Oe) and methane (CH 4 e) emissions. Economic affluence positively impacts CH4e, while positive trends in Te primarily increase CO 2 e. FI significantly reduces N 2 Oe, while FM notably decreases CO 2 e. Furthermore, FI has a significant negative impact on the emission intensity of Te, indicating its role in promoting green energy transition. These findings underscore the necessity for nuanced policy interventions that integrate FD with environmental objectives, promote green energy transition and address land‐use challenges.

Research topics

  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12482

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.