article · Journal of Robotic Surgery
Robotic assistance has been increasingly incorporated into bariatric surgery. However, data regarding newer modular robotic-assisted platforms such as the Versius® Surgical Robotic System remain limited, particularly in developing healthcare settings. To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted bariatric surgery (RABS) using the Versius® system in a high-volume bariatric center. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 robotic-assisted bariatric procedures performed between December 2021 and December 2024. Procedures included primary and revisional bariatric operations. The Versius® system was used as a robotic-assisted platform, with laparoscopic stapling, energy devices, and suction performed through an assistant port. Demographic data, operative metrics, complications, length of stay, and six-month postoperative outcomes were analyzed descriptively. The mean BMI was 43.85 ± 6.7 kg/m². Procedures included Sleeve Gastrectomy (n = 132), One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (n = 25), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (n = 22), and Revisional Surgery (n = 21). Docking time decreased from 17 to 7 min, and console time stabilized after 30–40 cases. There were no conversions to open or laparoscopic surgery. The six-month morbidity rate was 1.5% (Clavien-Dindo Grade I–IIIb). RABS using the Versius® platform is safe and feasible in this series, demonstrating a manageable learning curve. While the platform is adoptable in emerging healthcare settings, comparative studies are required to establish its clinical and cost advantages over standard laparoscopy. • Represents the first national experience with the Versius® robotic platform in bariatric surgery. • Analyzes 200 robotic-assisted bariatric procedures, including primary and revisional cases. • Demonstrates a short learning curve with significant improvement in console and docking times. • Confirms safety, reproducibility, and ergonomic advantages of robotic-assisted bariatric surgery.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03209-8
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.