MARATTO

article · Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine

Fasciola worm and egg-derived antigens: Exploring their diagnostic potential for urogenital schistosomiasis in resource-limited endemic regions

2024Open accessUniversity of Ibadan

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the immunodiagnostic potential of crude Fasciola gigantica-worm (FWA) and egg antigen (FEA) in detecting anti-Schistosoma ( S. ) haematobium antibodies in sera and urine samples. Methods: This is a cross-sectional diagnostic study. Employing an indirect ELISA, antibodies against these antigens were assessed in samples from infected and non-infected individuals in both schistosomiasis endemic (NE) and non-endemic (NNE) areas, using microscopy as the diagnostic standard. Results: FWA-sera exhibited excellent diagnostic accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.957, a sensitivity of 93.75%, and a specificity of 85.42% for discriminating between infected and non-infected individuals in non-endemic areas. FWA-urine also demonstrated robust performance, achieving AUC>0.95, sensitivity>97.0%, and specificity>85.0% in both NE and NNE categories. Notably, S. haematobium -specific antibody levels against FWA were significantly elevated in infected individuals in both endemic and non-endemic areas. FEA-sera exhibited outstanding diagnostic performance with sensitivity exceeding 90% and an AUC of 0.968 in non-endemic samples but not in FEA-urine. Conclusions: FWA-based ELISAs, applicable to both sera and urine, emerge as promising tools for S. haematobium diagnosis in resource-limited settings, offering advantages of high sensitivity and specificity with shared antigens with Fasciola . The superior diagnostic metrics of urine samples suggest their potential as a noninvasive biological sample for diagnostic purposes.

Research topics

  • Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Helminth infection and control
  • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/apjtm.apjtm_80_24

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.