MARATTO

article · Computation

Exploring Flexible Penalization of Bayesian Survival Analysis Using Beta Process Prior for Baseline Hazard

20252 citationsOpen accessKwara State University

Abstract

High-dimensional data have attracted considerable interest from researchers, especially in the area of variable selection. However, when dealing with time-to-event data in survival analysis, where censoring is a key consideration, progress in addressing this complex problem has remained somewhat limited. Moreover, in microarray research, it is common to identify groupings of genes involved in the same biological pathways. These gene groupings frequently collaborate and operate as a unified entity. Therefore, this study is motivated to adopt the idea of a penalized semi-parametric Bayesian Cox (PSBC) model through elastic-net and group lasso penalty functions (PSBC-EN and PSBC-GL) to incorporate the grouping structure of the covariates (genes) and optimally perform variable selection. The proposed methods assign a beta process prior to the cumulative baseline hazard function (PSBC-EN-B and PSBC-GL-B), instead of the gamma process prior used in existing methods (PSBC-EN-G and PSBC-GL-G). Three real-life datasets and simulation scenarios were considered to compare and validate the efficiency of the modified methods with existing techniques, using Bayesian information criteria (BIC). The results of the simulated studies provided empirical evidence that the proposed methods performed better than the existing methods across a wide range of data scenarios. Similarly, the results of the real-life study showed that the proposed methods revealed a substantial improvement over the existing techniques in terms of feature selection and grouping behavior.

Research topics

  • Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Statistical Methods and Inference

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/computation13020021

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.