article · Information
The present study provides a multi-faceted validation and refinement of a distributed system architecture designed to improve emergency response in resource-constrained urban areas. The architecture integrates IoT sensors, edge computing, field-programmable gate arrays and distributed shortest-path algorithms to enhance resilience and operational efficiency. As a primary validation strategy, a survey of 78 Cameroonian experts in software engineering, distributed systems, urban planning and emergency technologies was conducted. The survey yielded quantitative and qualitative data across multiple analytical dimensions, including subgroup analysis and a transferability assessment covering Nigeria, Senegal, and Kenya. The statistical analysis confirmed that the architecture is technically feasible, adaptable to local constraints, and has the potential to reduce response times. As a secondary validation strategy, a simulation-based study was conducted using iFogSim on smart-city models ranging from 25 to 100 nodes, encompassing five experiments: result consistency, geographic sensitivity, concurrent incident management, path-caching efficiency, and scalability analysis. The simulation results quantitatively corroborate the expert assessments, demonstrating low end-to-end latency and sustained throughput with realistic urban load conditions. Key challenges identified include interoperability, urban data structuring, financial sustainability and inter-institutional coordination. Experts have proposed a hierarchical structure of priority actions and concrete recommendations for engineers, researchers and policymakers. The combined findings validate the architecture and establish a replicable expert-simulation evaluation framework applicable to analogous distributed emergency-response systems in comparable resource-constrained contexts. The empirical results further constitute a reference baseline for the design and implementation of similar architectures.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/info17060582
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.