MARATTO

article · Energy Science & Engineering

Experimental study on the effect of process parameters on postcombustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture using rotating packed bed technology

20247 citationsOpen accessUniversity of the Witwatersrand

Abstract

Abstract Environmental issues are the most discussed in today's industrialized world, and this has always been associated with the emission of greenhouse gases. CO 2 emissions, especially from power plants, are considered the major greenhouse gas source. Capturing CO 2 from large emission sources is necessary to address the worst impacts of climate change, including more frequent and severe droughts, heat waves, and intermittent rainfall. Conventional post‐combustion CO 2 capture has always been questioned because of its high impact on energy costs. Rotating packed bed technology has shown the potential to reduce the cost of CO 2 capture. This paper presents an experimental study on an in‐house designed rotating packed bed absorber for the capture of CO 2 from a flue gas stream. Effects of process parameters such as rotating speed, liquid‐to‐gas ratio, and monoethanolamine (MEA) concentration on CO 2 capture efficiency and overall volumetric mass transfer coefficient were studied. The study showed that as rotor speed increased, the CO 2 capture efficiency increased, this can be attributed to higher rotor speed, resulting in more droplet flow, indicating an increase in the area of contact between the flue gas and the MEA solvent. Also, as the concentration of MEA increased CO 2 capture efficiency increased, since an increase in concentration results in an increase in the rate of reaction. Finally, the study showed that a rotating packed bed absorber is an efficient unit for CO 2 capture since it enhances mass transfer performance.

Research topics

  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Adsorption and Cooling Systems
  • Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/ese3.1736

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.