article · European Journal of Dentistry
This study evaluated the efficacy of Acacia Arabica and aloe vera solutions versus commercial effervescent tablets on <i>Candida</i> viability and adhesion to various denture bases with different materials and manufacturing techniques.A total of 96 square-shaped denture base specimens (24 per group) were fabricated from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), thermoformed polyamide (FlexiUltra), milled computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM; Avadent), and 3D-printed (FormLabs) resins. Specimens were allocated into a control group (distilled water) and three experimental groups (<i>n</i> = 6 per group) based on the immersion solutions: Gum acacia (GA), aloe vera, and alkaline peroxide denture cleansers. One specimen from each material subgroup was prepared for qualitative assessment. All specimens were incubated with <i>Candida albicans</i> for 48 hours and immersed in the designated disinfectant solution for 8 hours. Anti-<i>C. albicans</i> biofilm activity was assessed quantitatively using an MTT assay and qualitatively using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM).One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed for mean comparison, and data were considered significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05.The reduction in mean <i>Candida</i> viability was greatest in the alkaline peroxide tablets across all denture base materials, followed by GA and aloe vera (<i>p</i> < 0.001). GA demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in <i>Candida</i> levels in the thermoplastic polyamide (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean viability of <i>Candida</i> in both alkaline peroxide tablets and GA was statistically similar in digital denture bases (<i>p</i> > 0.05).The antifungal efficacy of alkaline peroxide denture cleansers was determined to be the highest. The cost-effective GA may serve as a viable denture disinfectant, particularly for thermoformed polyamide denture bases.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810440
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.