MARATTO

article · Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases

Evaluation of Non-invasive Scores for Predicting Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy Severity in Egyptian Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Abstract

Background and study aim: Mucosal ectasia of the stomach in portal hypertension is recognized as portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) recorded by transient elastography (Fibroscan) has a substantial association with portal hypertension and the anticipation of esophageal varices (EVs). We aimed to understand the contribution of LSM, liver stiffness-spleen size-to-platelet ratio score (LSPS), platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (PSR), and right lobe diameter/albumin ratio (RLAR) in predicting PHG occurrence and extent in cirrhotic patients. Patients and Methods: 192 cirrhotic patients were categorized into Group 1 (48 patients with PHG and EVs), Group 2 (48 patients with EVs), Group 3 (48 patients with PHG), and Group 4 (48 patients with neither PHG nor EVs as control). All patients underwent upper endoscopy, Ultrasonography, routine lab. and Fibroscan evaluation. Results: PSR correlated inversely while RLAR, LSM, and LSPS correlated directly with PHG presence and severity (P <0.001). PSR threshold of 3.11 predicted PHG with AUC 0.648, sensitivity 79.2%, specificity 39.6%, PPV 56.7%, and NPV 65.5%. LSM predicted PHG at a threshold of >18.35 kPa with an AUC of 0.622, sensitivity 76%, specificity 52.1%, PPV 61.3%, and NPV 68.5%. LSPS cut-off value of >2.12 predicted PHG with an AUC of 0.680, sensitivity 76%, specificity 53.1%, PPV 61.9%, and NPV 68.9%. Conclusion: LSM, LSPS, PSR, and RLAR are easy, non-invasive, inexpensive modalities predicting PHG existence and severity in cirrhotic patients.

Research topics

  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Liver Diseases and Immunity

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/aeji.2025.331038.1422

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.