article · Al-Azhar International Medical Journal /Al-Azhar International Medical Journal
Background: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for ulcerative colitis diagnosis. However, colonoscopy is invasive & often requires deep sedation & extensive preparation. The current study compared fecal calgranulin C versus fecal calprotectin in ulcerative colitis as a predictor of activity, compared to the invasive procedure of colonoscopy. Patient and Methods: 50 patients diagnosed with UC were involved in this study. They enrolled from the Gastroenterology Department. Patients with gastric malignancy, necrotizing enterocolitis, IBS & colonic cancer, or pregnant females were excluded. Results: Patients in the active group had significant anemia, higher WBCs, higher absolute neutrophilic count, lower lymphocytes %, lower serum albumin levels, higher CRP levels & higher ESR levels compared to those in the remission state. Patients in the active group had higher fecal calprotectin levels (630.18 μg/mg) & fecal Calgranulin C (689.32 μg/mg) levels in comparison to patients in the remission state (76.64 & 82.68 μg/mg), respectively. While there were statistically significant negative correlations between fecal calprotectin level & hemoglobin, lymphocytes %, monocytes % & serum albumin. There were statistically significant positive correlations between fecal Calgranulin C level & WBCs, absolute neutrophilic count, neutrophils %, NLR, CRP & ESR1. There was a highly statistically significant positive correlation between fecal Calgranulin C level & fecal calprotectin levels. Conclusion: Fecal Calgranulin C is more specific compared to other inflammatory markers in the prediction of Ulcerative colitis activity. Therefore, it is recommended to include it in the follow-up of UC patients.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/aimj.2026.449116.3085
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.