MARATTO

article · Journal of Engineering Research

Evaluation of citric acid-treated natural fibres as sustainable additives for improving expansive soil performance in highway construction

20244 citationsOpen accessUniversity of the Witwatersrand

Abstract

This study addresses the evaluation of citric acid-treated natural fibres as sustainable additives for improving soil performance in highway construction. A series of tests were conducted on the soil to assess its baseline properties. The natural soil exhibited a Plasticity Index (PI) of 30 and Linear Shrinkage of 12%, along with a Liquid Limit (LL) of 65 and Plastic Limit (PL) of 35. Additionally, the fines content (<0.075 mm) and sand content (0.075–4.7 mm) were determined to be 79.6% and 20.4%, respectively. The soil's mineral composition included Quartz (5%), Orthoclase (3–5%), Montmorillonite (2.6%), and Illite (18.2%), with key components identified through chemical analysis: SiO2 (52.721 wt%), Fe2O3 (16.132 wt%), and Al2O3 (15.202 wt%). Subsequently, a range of tests were performed with varying additives to assess their impact on the soil's engineering properties. The sample containing 6% Sawdust (SD) additive exhibited notable improvements in multiple aspects. This sample achieved a maximum dry density (MDD) of 1856 kg/m³, surpassing the control (1900 kg/m³) and the 10% Rice Husk Ash (RHF) sample (1698 kg/m³). Furthermore, the 6% SD sample demonstrated enhanced Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) of 320 kPa, as opposed to the control's 121 kPa. Triaxial shear strength followed a similar pattern, peaking at 41 kPa for the 6% SD sample. The California Bearing Ratio (CBR), the 6% SD sample showcased significant improvements, achieving 41% for Unsoaked CBR and 36% for Soaked CBR. These results outperformed the control (25%) and the 4% RHF sample (37%). Additionally, the hydraulic conductivity of the 6% SD sample was notably lower at 4.98 ×10–8 cm/s compared to the control (3.35 ×10–8 cm/s) and the 4% RHF sample (4.58 ×10–8 cm/s). The Coefficient of Volume Change (Mv) further supported the superior performance of the 6% SD sample with a value of 0.6, indicating reduced settlement potential compared to the 4% RHF sample (Mv: 0.7). Based on the results, the 6% Sawdust (SD) additive consistently demonstrated the most favourable engineering properties for the expansive clay soil. hence, it is recommended that the 6% SD sample be considered as an optimal choice for enhancing subgrade material, leading to improved performance and sustainability in highway construction.

Research topics

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jer.2024.02.012

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.