article · Built Heritage
Abstract Reusing heritage spaces as vibrant public areas can significantly enhance the quality of life and public spaces within a community. However, there is a notable gap in knowledge regarding evaluations of the success or failure of these upgrading and reuse initiatives. The literature suggests that evaluations should be conducted with comparative analyses of physical characteristics before and after the implementation of such programmes. This study proposes a post-adaptive reuse evaluation method for assessing the quality of heritage spaces and community development. The research employs methodological triangulation by incorporating sociospatial analysis with three methods: 1) deductive reasoning to assess the quality of heritage spaces; 2) in-depth interviews with users of these spaces; and 3) sensitivity to context observations. These methods were applied across three different timeframes: before the upgrade, three years after the upgrade, and ten years after the upgrade. This study therefore provides a comprehensive and longitudinal analysis. This study assesses the adaptive reuse of Aslam Square in the Darb Al Ahmar district of Cairo, Egypt. The findings demonstrate that the post-adaptive reuse evaluation method is appropriate, and its use is recommended as a cause-and-effect indicator to promote heritage spaces and local community development.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s43238-025-00186-z
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.