article · Tanzania journal of health research/Tanzania Journal of Health Research
Microbial infections pose a severe global health threat, driven increasingly by antimicrobial resistance to existing drugs. While traditional communities frequently rely on medicinal flora, many therapies lack scientific documentation and laboratory validation. An ethnobotanical investigation conducted on Pemba Island gathered information from 42 local informants, recording 117 medicinal plant species across 48 families used to treat infection-related ailments. Plants addressing fever demonstrated the strongest consensus among participants, with Azadirachta indica achieving a 100 percent fidelity level. Selected botanical species underwent laboratory evaluation against bacterial and fungal strains using disc diffusion and microdilution techniques. Active extracts generated inhibition zones between 9.5 mm and 18 mm, alongside minimum inhibitory concentrations spanning 0.625 mg/mL to 2.5 mg/mL. The biological evaluations confirmed notable antibacterial activity against common human pathogens, specifically Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Rising antimicrobial resistance weakens the power of standard medicines, threatening global healthcare systems. By recording indigenous knowledge and testing native plant species in the laboratory, researchers can substantiate traditional remedies and identify promising biological starting points for new treatments against widespread pathogens such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.
This research provides early-stage laboratory data that could guide pharmaceutical researchers seeking natural leads for novel antimicrobial agents. Because the work remains at the in vitro screening stage, it is far from real-world clinical application and requires substantial subsequent isolation, safety testing, and formulation development before commercial uptake is possible.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Introduction: Microbial infections are among the most life-threatening factors worldwide, killing millions of people annually. The high number of deaths is partly due to the antimicrobial resistance of some microbes to available antimicrobial agents on the market. On the other hand, local communities have used medicinal plants to manage microbial-related infections for a long time, but most of these plants are not well documented or even evaluated. This study aims to contribute to the documentation and evaluation of medicinal plants reported to be used for microbial infection management. The data recorded may be used for further research in the discovery of new antimicrobial agents, thereby saving the lives of people in the future. Methodology: An ethnobotanical survey was conducted to collect data from 42 local informants through semi-structured interviews in Pemba Island. The plants with higher fidelity levels were selected for antimicrobial assays whereby disc diffusion and microdilution methods were used. Results: A total of 117 plants belonging to 48 families were reported for use in the management of microbial infection conditions. Fever scored the highest Informant consensus factor (ICF) of 0.76 showing a high degree of agreement on the potential plants used for fever. Azadirachta indica scored the highest Fidelity Level (FL) of 100% for fever showing the potentiality of the particular plant species. This study evaluated plant species commonly used for the management of microbial infections in vitro for antimicrobial activity against bacteria and fungi strains. Results obtained show that the zones of inhibition for the active plant species ranged between 9.5mm and 18mm. The MICs of the active plant species ranged from 0.625mg/mL to 2.5mg/mL. Conclusion: The findings show that most of the medicinal plant species used by the Pemba community have notable activity against S. aureus, E. coli, and K. Pneumoniae which are human pathogens.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4314/thrb.v26i3.9
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
