article · Indonesian Journal of Computer Science
This study addresses the need for responsible AI adoption in higher education by developing a human-centred ethical extension of the UTAUT2 model. It integrates two new constructs; AI fairness and human autonomy support and three ethical moderators: ethical risk awareness, perceived algorithm bias and user autonomy concern. To validate the framework, an empirical investigation was conducted with 400 respondents using a structured questionnaire, with data analyzed via regression. All sixteen hypotheses were supported. The model demonstrated strong predictive power, explaining 72.2% of the variance in behavioural intention and 69.1% in use behaviour. The results provide meaningful insights into how ethical perceptions influence adoption. Ultimately, the framework offers practical guidance for policymakers, educators and developers to ensure fair, trustworthy and human-centric AI integration in learning environments.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.33022/ijcs.v15i1.5079
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.