MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Animal Science

Enteric methane emission response to peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) haulms supplementation in zebu cattle diets

2025Open accessNazi Boni University

Abstract

Improving the quality of ruminant rations is a promising strategy for mitigating the climate impact of livestock farming in West Africa. Legume crop coproducts such as peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) and cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) haulms are a high-protein fodder commonly used by agropastoral farmers during the dry season. This study evaluated their potential to reduce enteric methane (eCH 4 ) emissions when used as supplements for Panicum maximum C1 hay. Ten Sudanese Fulani zebu bulls (49 ± 1.2 months; 183.7 ± 15.9 kg) were housed individually and fed 11 diets ad libitum : a control diet of 100% P. maximum and 10 experimental diets combining P. maximum with either peanut or cowpea haulms at ratios of 85:15, 70:30, 55:45, 40:60, and 25:75. Each trial lasted 21 days, comprising a 14-day adaptation period and a 7-day data collection period for feed intake, digestibility, and eCH 4 emissions. The latter were measured six times daily using the GreenFeed system. Supplementation increased protein content by 47.5% to 183.5% and ADL by 2.6% to 48.2% while reducing the content of crude fiber, NDF, and ADF. Feed intake increased by 17.8% to 49.1% ( p < 0.05), and digestibility improved by 4.6% to 9.9% ( p < 0.05). Peanut haulms reduced eCH 4 yield by up to 6.1% ( p < 0.05), while cowpea haulms achieved reductions of 3.7%–4.8% ( p = 0.14). The most effective mitigation was achieved with 75% peanut or 45% cowpea haulms, confirming the potential of legume coproducts to enhance feed efficiency and reduce eCH 4 emissions in West African cattle systems.

Research topics

  • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Peanut Plant Research Studies
  • Agricultural pest management studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1704252

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.