article · Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
This study investigates the aerodynamic optimization of super high-rise buildings using CFD and one-way fluid–structure interaction (FSI) simulations in ANSYS. Three building configurations square, helical square, and setback–helical were analyzed to assess the influence of geometric modification on velocity distribution, wake development, pressure coefficient, and structural response. The results show that the helical and setback–helical configurations reduce the surface-averaged pressure coefficient by 12.54% and 23.45%, respectively, compared with the square baseline. The structural analysis further indicates a reduction in the maximum stress response, confirming the beneficial effect of geometric modification on both aerodynamic and structural performance. These findings demonstrate that combined setback and helical strategies can significantly improve the wind resistance of super high-rise buildings. The setback–helical configuration also reduced the maximum equivalent structural stress by 37.74% compared with the square baseline, demonstrating its potential to improve structural safety and wind-resistant design.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2026.108282
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.