article · Bioresource Technology Reports
Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of grass waste (GS) with fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) was evaluated to improve methane generation from lignocellulosic biomass. Batch BMP tests were performed using raw grass (GSr), size-reduced grass (GSp), and GS:FVW mixtures. FVW exhibited high biodegradability (453 Nml CH 4 /gVS; BDI 97.7%), whereas GS showed markedly lower conversion (169 Nml CH 4 /gVS ; BDI 41.2%). Particle-size reduction of grass from 20 mm to <5 mm increased the methane production rate but did not significantly affect ultimate methane yield. Co-digestion behavior was strictly additive, with CPI values approximately equal to 1 for all mixtures. Among the kinetic formulations, the Two-fractions First-order and Multi-stages models provided the best description of methane production, particularly when BMP values were fixed to their theoretical predictions derived from CHNSO. A mathematical demonstration showed that the analytic expression of the Multi-stage model can be transformed into the Two-fractions First-order formulation, confirming their mathematical equivalence despite differing conceptual interpretations. These results highlight the suitability of FVW as a co-substrate for GS digestion and demonstrate the value of kinetic modeling for interpreting and predicting biomethane production from slowly degradable feedstocks. • Grass particle size reduction slightly improved methane production rates • Theoretical BMP overestimated methane yield for lignocellulosic grass substrates • Multi-phase and multi-stage models provided the best fit for methane production kinetics • Co-digestion of grass and fruit-vegetable waste showed strictly additive behavior • Kinetic modeling explains BMP gaps for lignocellulosic waste • Mathematical derivation shows the multi-stage and multi-phase models are equivalent
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2026.102597
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.