article · Journal Of Big Data
Cardiovascular diseases are a global health challenge that necessitates improvements in diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This study examines the potential of deep learning (DL) models for the classification of electrocardiogram (ECG) images to assist in the identification of various cardiac conditions. We initiated a two-tiered experimental framework to investigate the effectiveness of several neural network architectures in this medical application. In the first experiment, eight distinct neural network models were selected based on their top-5 accuracy on the ImageNet validation dataset and were fine-tuned using transfer learning techniques. These models were assessed using a cross-validation scheme, focusing on balanced accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1-score to evaluate their classification capabilities across four cardiac conditions: Myocardial Infarction (MI), abnormal heartbeat, historical MI, and normal ECG patterns. The second experiment extended our inquiry into the power of ensemble learning. By testing all possible combinations of the chosen models, we explored 120 ensemble configurations. The resulting analysis identified the best-performing ensemble set, which did not include the least effective model based on F1 score rankings. The most effective ensemble, composed of Inception, MobileNet, and NASNetLarge, achieved an F1 score of 0.9651 and a balanced accuracy of 0.9640, indicating a superior predictive performance. The ROC curve analysis yielded near-perfect Area Under the Curve (AUC) values for all classes, underscoring the ensemble’s proficiency in distinguishing between the specified cardiac conditions. The outcomes of this research highlight the synergistic benefit of ensembles in DL applications for medical imaging and suggest a promising approach for the early detection and diagnosis of cardiac diseases, potentially improving clinical outcomes and patient care.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s40537-025-01070-4
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.