article · Journal of Digital Security and Forensics
Compared to more conventional techniques such as fingerprint recognition, the use of biometric authentication systems in computer-based examinations offers several advantages. To overcome the disadvantages of fingerprint biometrics, such as high administrative costs, long authentication times, and accuracy issues, this paper proposes an innovative solution that leverages state-of-the- art facial recognition technology. Although biometric fingerprint systems are reliable to a certain extent, they present significant challenges in the context of computer-assisted examinations. The authentication process can be time-consuming and can result in delays and logistical problems. These systems can also be prone to errors, including false positives and false negatives, compromising the integrity of the investigation process. These limitations require research into more efficient and accurate biometric solutions. The developed system uses FaceNet and Multi- Task Cascaded Convolutional Neural Network (MTCNN) algorithms in achieving superior accuracy, efficiency, as well as security in verifying candidates' identities during exams. FaceNet excels at facial recognition by mapping faces in a compact Euclidean space, ensuring high accuracy even with slight variations in facial expressions, angles or lighting conditions. MTCNN increases the robustness of the system through precise face detection and alignment, which are critical for reliable performance. The results show that the facial recognition system outperforms traditional fingerprint-based methods. Accuracy is significantly improved, reducing misidentifications, while streamlining the authentication process, minimizing delays, and improving overall efficiency. The robustness of the system ensures consistent performance despite environmental fluctuations.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.29121/digisecforensics.v1.i1.2024.24
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.