MARATTO

preprint · F1000Research

Enhanced human periodontal ligament stem cell viability and osteogenic differentiation on two implant materials: An experimental in vitro study

Abstract

<ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Background:</ns4:bold> Surface roughness of dental implants impacts the survival of adult periodontal stem cells and rate of differentiation. This research was conducted to test how human periodontal ligament stem cells behaved on yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) discs with different surface topographies. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods:</ns4:bold> Discs roughening was prepared by sandblasting. Stem cells were cultivated on zirconia discs with a polished surface, PEEK discs with a polished surface, sandblasted zirconia discs and sandblasted PEEK discs. Cells viability was assessed after 24, 48, 72 hours. Scanning electron microscopy was used to examine the adherence and attachment of cells. Osteoblastic differentiation capacity was studied by checking the mineralization clusters development through alizarin red S staining and alkaline phosphatase assay. ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test were used for the statistical analysis. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results:</ns4:bold> Polished PEEK discs showed lower cell viability, whereas roughened sandblasted zirconia and PEEK discs showed the highest proliferation rates and cell viability percent. The osteogenic differentiation was enhanced for rough surfaces in comparison to polished surfaces. Sandblasted zirconia and PEEK discs showed a markedly increased mineralized nodule development and ALP enzyme activity compared to the polished surface and control. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions:</ns4:bold> Micro- topographies creation on the PEEK implant surface enhances stem cell attachment, viability, and osteogenic differentiation. </ns4:p>

Research topics

  • Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.129562.1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.