article · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Background Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) commonly feature lingering symptoms of persistent cardiovascular pathology, yet the mechanisms remain incompletely defined. The ADMA–DDAH–NO x axis is a central regulator of endothelial function: ADMA inhibits endothelial NOx synthase, while DDAH clears most circulating ADMA. Although ADMA is linked to acute COVID-19 severity, its regulation in PASC remains largely unknown. Methods We performed integrated vascular and cardiac phenotyping in 49 RECOVER participants: never-infected controls ( n = 10), recovered COVID-19 without persistent symptoms (PASC−, n = 20), and PASC with persistent cardiovascular-related symptoms lasting ≥12 weeks post-infection (PASC+, n = 19). We measured ADMA, DDAH, NO, inflammatory/coagulation markers, endothelial function [brachial and microvascular flow-mediated dilation (FMD)], and cardiac structure and function using comprehensive echocardiography with speckle-tracking strain. Results PASC+ exhibited the highest inflammatory and thrombotic markers, with D-dimer being > 3-fold higher than controls, and hs-CRP nearly threefold higher. PASC+ demonstrated lower NOx and substantially higher ADMA than the other two groups, accompanied by only modest DDAH upregulation, suggesting insufficient counter-regulation. Endothelial function was significantly impaired in the PASC+ group compared to the control and PASC- groups, as evidenced by lower brachial and microvascular FMD. PASC+ individuals exhibited worse longitudinal mechanics and higher levels of hs-troponin and NT-proBNP. Ejection fraction was lower in PASC+ compared with Controls and PASC−. Conclusions These findings identify an imbalance in the ADMA–DDAH–NO x axis that is associated with endothelial dysfunction and cardiac involvement in cardiovascular-symptom PASC, supporting a potentially targetable pathway for risk stratification and therapeutic investigation.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1802359
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.