MARATTO

article · Neutrosophic Systems with Applications

Emergent Operator Logic: A Foundational Framework for Dynamic Reasoning and Generative Intelligence

2026Open accessZagazig University

Abstract

This paper introduces Emergent Operator Logic (EOL), a framework that treats propositions as continuous operators $F_p:X \rightarrow X$ on a complete metric state space $( X,d )$ and evaluates truth after action via a continuous valuation $V:X \rightarrow [ 0,1 ]$. Logical composition is realized by three operator-level connectives: sequential $p \circ q$(causal order), parallel $p\parallel q$(1-Lipschitz cooperative blend), and the emergent synthesis $E( p,q ) = \frac12( F_p \circ F_q + F_q \circ F_p )$, which symmetrizes non-commuting actions. We provide a Hilbert-style proof system (sound), an algebraic semantics via E-algebras, and show that the category of E-algebras is symmetric monoidal closed, ensuring compositionality. For computation, propositions are implemented as contractive functions (Lipschitz constant $L < 1$) on [ 0,1 ]; the evaluator converges geometrically with iteration complexity $O( log( 1/\varepsilon ) )$ to tolerance $\varepsilon $. Empirical studies on decision and control tasks and a public dataset demonstrate that EOL extends and outperforms in specific scenarios, particularly where order effects matter, while remaining interpretable. Scope. Our strongest guarantees (uniqueness, geometric convergence, and contractive completeness) hold under contraction; for broader non-contractive regimes, fixed-point existence can still be ensured on compact convex domains (e.g., by Brouwer), though uniqueness and rates are not guaranteed. EOL thus unifies dynamic reasoning, algebraic structure, and practical evaluation within a single, rigorous framework.

Research topics

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Logic, programming, and type systems

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.63689/2993-7159.1328

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.