article · Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
Introduction: Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin condition, affects 125 million worldwide. Current treatments provide symptomatic relief but face limitations. Guselkumab shows promise for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Objective: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the safety and efficacy of guselkumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing guselkumab to placebo in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Primary endpoints: Investigators’ Global Assessment (IGA) 0, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90, and ≥1 adverse event (AE). Secondary endpoints: IGA 0/1, PASI75, PASI100, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and ≥1 severe AE. RStudio was used for statistical analyses. Results: We included 1607 patients from 6 RCTs. Guselkumab significantly increased odds of IGA 0 (odds ratio (OR) OR: 73.87; 95%confidence interval (CI): 32.53-167.73; P<0.00001; I2=0.0%), and IGA 0/1 (OR: 54.84; 95% CI: 24.72–121.64; P<0.00001; I2=60.1%). Also, the OR of PASI75 (OR: 58.42; 95% CI: 23.03–148.17; P<0.001; I2=70.0%), PASI90 (OR: 46.47; 95% CI: 14.23–151.76; P<0.001; I2=71.7%), and PASI100 (OR: 59.27; 95% CI: 23.17–151.61; P<0.001; I2=0.0%) were higher with guselkumab. DLQI change was greater with guselkumab (MD: -8.46; 95% CI: -10.31 – -6.62; P<0.01; I²=77.8%). No significant difference in AEs and severe AEs between guselkumab and placebo (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.68–1.24; P=0.58; I²=30.9%), (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.54–2.64; P=0.66; I²=0.0%). Leave-one-out analysis identified PROTOSTAR as a source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed higher IGA 0 and PASI90 ORs in adults than in adolescents/children, with no dosage-based differences in PASI90 or AE. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that guselkumab does significantly improve moderate-to-severe psoriasis, without a significant increase in AEs.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1602a6534
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.