MARATTO

article · Annual Research & Review in Biology

Effects of Fertiliser Treatments on Agronomic and Technological Parameters of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) in the Integrated Agricultural Unit of SUCRIVOIRE-Zuénoula, Côte d'Ivoire

Abstract

Mineral fertilisation is one of the main ways to improve sugarcane productivity and quality, but simultaneously optimising these two objectives remains a major challenge in tropical production systems. This study, conducted at the Integrated Agricultural Unit (UAI) in Zuénoula (Côte d’Ivoire), evaluated the impact of five types of fertilisers, including a new formulation rich in Ca, S, and Mg, on the agronomic and technological parameters of sugarcane. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA (with Tukey's HSD post-hoc test) and simple linear regression after verifying normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) and homoscedasticity (Bartlett's test). The results showed that treatment (T1) NPK 18-9-24 produced the highest cane yield at 82.88 ± 4.17 tc.ha⁻¹ and promoted vegetative growth. In contrast, treatment (T2) SPT + KCl improved processing quality, with a purity of 93.53 ± 0.32% and a sucrose content of 11.12 ± 0.21%. Treatment (T3) NPK + SPT + KCl provided the best compromise, with a cane yield of 81.15 ± 2.48 tc.ha⁻¹ and a purity of 91.98 ± 0.26%. A significant productivity-quality trade-off was observed between stem height and juice purity (R² = 0.159; p < 0.05). The new formulation (T4) 13-10-30 + 3Ca + 1S + 1.3Mg did not improve technological quality. These results indicate that an appropriate fertilisation strategy can reduce the trade-off between productivity and quality, while K and S enrichment is an agronomic option for improving the technological quality of sugarcane. By explicitly quantifying this trade-off using an integrated approach, this study provides a preliminary decision-making framework for optimising fertilisation in the sugarcane industry.

Research topics

  • Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
  • Growth and nutrition in plants
  • Natural Products and Biological Research

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.9734/arrb/2026/v41i102460

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.