article · Management Journal for Advanced Research
The Constituency Development Fund (CDF) in Zambia has become a central fiscal decentralization tool aimed at fostering inclusive development and improve service delivery at the constituency level. This study assessed the effectiveness of the CDF accountability framework on service delivery in Chawama and Kanyama constituencies of Lusaka, Zambia. Specifically, it examined stakeholders’ perceptions of key accountability elements, assessed the effectiveness of accountability elements on service delivery and critically analysed challenges affecting CDF accountability. Employing a convergent parallel mixed‑methods design, the study integrated quantitative data from structured questionnaires administered to 193 stratified random respondents (144 returned; 75% response rate) with qualitative insights from 18 purposively selected informants, including CDF Committee members, Ward Development Committees, council officers, and community representatives. Reliability and validity were ensured through pre-testing, triangulation and consistency in checks. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics in SPSS, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. Findings reveal that transparency, financial management and M&E significantly influence service delivery, with financial management emerging as the most critical driver of service delivery outcomes. However, the full realization of the fund’s developmental impact is constrained by political interference, limited technical capacity, inadequate financial reporting, bureaucratic delays, weak monitoring systems, and restricted information disclosure. The study concludes that while the CDF accountability framework in Chawama and Kanyama constituencies is structurally well-established, its effectiveness in improving service delivery is constrained by weak enforcement, limited capacity, and operational inefficiencies. The study stresses the necessity of strengthening transparency, building CDF committee capacity, financial management through results‑based financing linked to verified outputs. It further underscores the need for stronger monitoring and evaluation and enforcing independent audits to ensure compliance and improve the effectiveness of service delivery.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.54741/mjar/6.2.2026.303
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.