article · Applied Food Research
Cocoa liquor serves as a fundamental intermediate in chocolate production, with its quality attributes largely determined by post-harvest processing parameters. This study investigated the effects of varying mechanical depulping levels (0%, 50% and 100% pulp removal) and roasting conditions (110°C for 60 min, 120°C for 30 min and 135°C for 10 min) on the physical and sensory characteristics of cocoa liquor produced from Ghanaian cocoa beans ( Theobroma cacao L. ). A 3 × 3 full factorial design was implemented under a Completely Randomized Design framework. Following standardized fermentation (6 days) and drying (55°C to 7-8% moisture content), beans were roasted, milled and evaluated for textural properties (firmness: 175.93-584.80 g; consistency: 963.66-1847.96 g·s; cohesiveness: 165.02-360.64 g) and viscosity index (728.5-1364.9 g·s) using back-extrusion analysis. Quantitative Descriptive Analysis by 10 trained panellists (2 males, 8 females; age range 25-45 years) assessed nine sensory attributes. Results demonstrated that depulping significantly reduced cohesiveness (F (1,23) =4.58, p=0.043) and modified consistency (F(3,23) =5.87, p=0.0066), with 100% depulping decreasing cohesiveness by 54% compared to undepulped controls. Complete depulping intensified bitterness (p<0.05) and astringency, attributable to elevated polyphenol retention (Asiedu et al., 2025). Moderate roasting at 120°C for 30 min produced optimal nutty and cocoa notes, particularly in non-depulped samples which exhibited significantly higher cocoa liquor aroma and flavour intensities (p<0.05). Strong correlations emerged between cohesiveness and viscosity index (r = 0.95, R 2 = 0.91, p<0.05). The combination of 50% depulping with moderate roasting (120°C/30 min) yielded cocoa liquor with improved texture, stable rheology (consistency: 1245.32 g·s) and enhanced sensory quality, providing practical guidance for optimizing cocoa processing operations.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.afres.2026.102033
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
