article · QJM
Abstract Introduction Massive burn patients are at high risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) as a complication of aggressive resuscitation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus 5% albumin solution on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in massive burn patients. Methods This was a single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial carried on at Ain Shams University (ASU) burn unit for 2 years. Where adult patients with burns 20 to 60 % of TBSA were equally randomized into HES group or albumin group. Results Fifty-two patients were equally randomized into 2 groups. There was no difference in age, sex, weight, type of burn, and TBSA between the two groups. The mean total resuscitation fluid volume in the first 48 hours was 213 ml/kg and 206.2 ml/kg for the HES group and the albumin group respectively (p = 0.674). IAP statistically was non-significantly higher in the HES group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups as regards the renal function tests. Conclusion Both HES and 5% albumin solution are effective and safe colloids for burn resuscitation. They partially have an equal effect on intra-abdominal pressure, renal involvement, and vital data stability in massive burn patients.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.553
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.